meka
New Member
Posts: 20
|
Post by meka on Nov 29, 2017 16:18:49 GMT
Analyzing an argument between lovers Imagine that Mead, Freud, and Skinner each overhear an argument between two lovers and that they attempt to analyze it from their respective points of view. Describe what features of the conversation you think each of the three is likely to pay attention to in order to understand the two people who are arguing. Explain why you think they would make these choices.
Mead (social in the eyes of the other)friends society comparing relationships to others how ppl treat their significant others. bring her friends opinion in (mom thinks i can do better) external how other relationships are. skinner (punishment and reward) what happened before. behaviour and cause ABC frued (unconscious) sex innate relationship with mom or dad sub conscious drives and urges.
I believe that they would make this choice, for the reason of their background psychology perspectives.
Meka
|
|
Asees
Junior Member
Posts: 86
|
Post by Asees on Dec 9, 2017 22:59:10 GMT
I see you are aware of their theories of human behavior, but how exactly will each theorist analyze a couple arguing? What will they say?
You may look at the other answer for assistance.
|
|