|
both
Sept 20, 2017 22:07:51 GMT
Post by negin94 on Sept 20, 2017 22:07:51 GMT
First to clarify the definition, reductionism theory argues that all behaviour and experiences could be reduced to biological factors such as the nervous system. Moghaddam has made it clear in his book that he believes there are things within psychology that can not be reduced to biology, and that it is essential to preserve the psychological aspect of things rather than only focusing on the scientific aspect of the spectrum. psychological aspect being phenomena that science cant necessary explain such as meaning systems within different cultures. For example, Moghaddam seems to agree that LTP (Long Term Potentiation, ch.5) is a great idea that helps us understand steps to the neural basis of learning which could potentially help us treat individuals with memory impairment. however, he states that learning in everyday life is a social process and that through interaction with others we participate in construction of meaning systems. He also mentions that some learning is culture dependant and meaning system ( such as gender roles) tend to vary across culture. Learning and memory is very complex and can not be reduced to a neuron. It seems to me that he likes the idea of reductionism which could help us understand some things better however, he believes this approach will not work for more complex problems.
|
|
Ali
Junior Member
Posts: 78
|
both
Sept 21, 2017 22:47:12 GMT
Post by Ali on Sept 21, 2017 22:47:12 GMT
Hi Negin,
I like your explanation and all the supporting points. Keep up the good work.
I would suggest to explain more on the last point that you mentioned. " likes the idea of reductionism which could help us understand some things better".
Maybe, provide an example or two to support this claim.
Other than that, nice work
Sincerely, Ali
|
|