Post by justin90 on Nov 23, 2017 1:15:23 GMT
I’m in terrible shape. I eat too many high-fat foods and don’t exercise
Behaviorist: Would see this type of behaviour based on a rewards and punishment system, or possible a conditioned stimulus. Either this individual feels rewarded when eating fast food/fatty foods, or some form of condioned stimulus (ie being in the cafeteria;CS insights a craving for fast food;CR). to change this behavior, The behaviorist would suggest that this individual find a way to associate eating fast foods with a punishing/negative feeling, or possible finding rewards in alternatively healthy behaviour (ie receiveing compliments from others when they loose weight/eat healthy) or avoid being stimulated by the conditioned stimulus (ie the cafeteria).
Kellys personal construct: This point of view assumes the individual sees their problem from a dualistic perspective ie being either FIT or FAT, with this individual obviously confiding in the latter. They might approach changing this mindset by either encouraging the individual to identify with the alternative view (FIT), or encourage them to adopt another dualistic perspective ie AGENCY/MINDLESSNESS where the individual either confides in making conscious choices concerning thier diet/lifestyle, or simply carries on like a mindless zombie.
I don’t trust men; they all say they’ll be true, but they never are.
Behaviorist: From a rewards and punishment perspective, they would assume this individual has associated relationships with males as being hurtful or negative, potentially from past experience. to address the issue, they may suggest that this individual find a way to build a single meaningful relationship with a male in an effort to replace feelings of punishment with feelings of reward, or positivity.
Social constructionist: May see this individual subscribing to a given societal norm, feminism in particular. They may suggest that this individual step back and critically analyze the discourse associated with feminism and make an informed decision regarding whether it fits with thier own personal values, or if it is a fixed narrative with an inability for agency depending on the situation (ie not all males may be bad dependant on the scenario)
Behaviorist: Would see this type of behaviour based on a rewards and punishment system, or possible a conditioned stimulus. Either this individual feels rewarded when eating fast food/fatty foods, or some form of condioned stimulus (ie being in the cafeteria;CS insights a craving for fast food;CR). to change this behavior, The behaviorist would suggest that this individual find a way to associate eating fast foods with a punishing/negative feeling, or possible finding rewards in alternatively healthy behaviour (ie receiveing compliments from others when they loose weight/eat healthy) or avoid being stimulated by the conditioned stimulus (ie the cafeteria).
Kellys personal construct: This point of view assumes the individual sees their problem from a dualistic perspective ie being either FIT or FAT, with this individual obviously confiding in the latter. They might approach changing this mindset by either encouraging the individual to identify with the alternative view (FIT), or encourage them to adopt another dualistic perspective ie AGENCY/MINDLESSNESS where the individual either confides in making conscious choices concerning thier diet/lifestyle, or simply carries on like a mindless zombie.
I don’t trust men; they all say they’ll be true, but they never are.
Behaviorist: From a rewards and punishment perspective, they would assume this individual has associated relationships with males as being hurtful or negative, potentially from past experience. to address the issue, they may suggest that this individual find a way to build a single meaningful relationship with a male in an effort to replace feelings of punishment with feelings of reward, or positivity.
Social constructionist: May see this individual subscribing to a given societal norm, feminism in particular. They may suggest that this individual step back and critically analyze the discourse associated with feminism and make an informed decision regarding whether it fits with thier own personal values, or if it is a fixed narrative with an inability for agency depending on the situation (ie not all males may be bad dependant on the scenario)
